[orm-devel] What do you think should go into 1.0?
Eric Walstad
orm-devel@mailman.tux4web.de
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:15:51 -0800
Diedrich,
I forgot to mention that I have a PostgreSQL view with an "interval"
data type:
View "funding_summary"
Column | Type | Modifiers
---------------+-----------------------------+-----------
fsid | integer |
...
days_remain | interval |
Notice that days_remain is of type interval, which when rendered looks like:
SELECT days_remain FROM funding_summary LIMIT 1;
days_remain
-------------
213 days
(1 row)
I'm just starting to play around with this view, but I'm assuming that I
should have a dbclass definition like this:
# Views
class funding_summary(dbclass):
columns = {"fsid" :integer(),
...
"days_remain" :varchar()}
That is, that the "interval" type should be a "varchar" orm column. Is
it reasonable to request you add an alias for interval types?
Thanks,
Eric.
--
_________________________
Eric Walstad
222 Winfield Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415-643-0812 voice & fax
eric@ericwalstad.com
_________________________
Diedrich Vorberg wrote:
> The subject says it.
>
> What are your experiances in terms of stability? Are there any
> features you keep avoiding because you can't rely on them? Or because
> they didn't work as you expected? Do you use ORM in a production
> environment and how is development going?
>
> Just a thought...
>
> Diedrich
>