Define a root group that contains the connectivity of a system of particles. This proposal builds on proposal 101 Particles and tuples lists for the storage of tuples. The interpretation of the information will be left to users and can be made more formal later with modules, for instance.
This proposal is intended to allow, among other uses, the storage of bonded interactions, in the case of force-field based simulations, or of distance constraints. The complexity of representing the details of force fields is such that it cannot be encoded in a generic manner here but the definition of the storage elements in this proposal lay a common basis.
The group I work with does a fair amount of analysis on bond lengths, angle distributions and dihedral angle distributions as validation for force field development. So our main use case for a 'topology' module would be to store the pairs, 3- and 4-tuples of atoms that define the bonds, angles and dihedrals. That said, I have use cases for wanting to store lists of non-bonded pairs of atoms such as opposing carbons on a ring or designated 'endpoint' atoms that can be used to represent the overall orientation of a larger molecule, and in this use case a specific 'bond' list would not really be appropriate. (...) I would definitely agree that a standard storage scheme, would be useful, even if the structure of a 'topology' section varies by module. That way, even if the location of the lists varies, at least the same routines can be used to read/write the data when it is located. As a possible example: <tuple-list> +-- type: String +-- dimension: Integer \-- values: Integer[n-tuples][D] Where a pair list would be dimension(D) = 2, and the values in list would be the particle IDs. Given what Konrad pointed out about flexibility vs. specificity ,the "type" string could have specific list of acceptable values, much like the boundary attribute in the 'box' item. For my particular use cases, I can see the following types of atom-tuple lists being useful as topology/connectivity information: bonds, angles, dihedrals, chains, and 'other'.
A specific problem of 2) is that for non-trivial forcefields (proteins etc.), a simple bond list is not of much use. What you want is *all* forcefield terms. I can't think of any practical use for just the bonds.
The connectivity information is stored as tuples in the group
/connectivity. The tuples are pairs, triples, etc. as needed.
A list of particles is an H5MD element:
/connectivity <name>: Integer[N] +-- particles_group: String
N is the length of the list and
particles_group is the
name of a group within
/particles. Several connectivity elements may
be defined for any particles group but a connectivity element may only
refer to a single particle group.
If the corresponding
particles_group does not possess the
element, the values in
list_name correspond to the indexing of the
particles_group. Else, the values in
be put in correspondence with the equal values in the